Neurocam and the sinister lies you are not to believe
Everyone knows about The Age article right? Yeah everyone knows about that. Thats what attracted people to Neurocam back in Phase 1. But looking around, there are a few interesting things to be found.
"The newspaper article written by Mr. Marc Moncrief is a potentially slanderous fiction, complied by him from half-truths, materials of questionable veracity and blatant lies. Despite his claims to the contrary, the photos contained within the article are also fabricated, staged by Mr. Moncrief in an attempt to add an atmosphere of “sinister mystery” to his article."
Written by Gertrude Zelle, 2005.
The sinister lies crop up over and over again and Neurocam debunks them each time. But naturally, none of us believe a word of it. Which do you prefer? Neurocam the innocent organisation working towards something you don't understand, but thanks for you help. Or Neurocam, the dark organisation working towards something that appears to be very bad, and you are the pawn?
For some reason, I'd rather be the pawn.
"The newspaper article written by Mr. Marc Moncrief is a potentially slanderous fiction, complied by him from half-truths, materials of questionable veracity and blatant lies. Despite his claims to the contrary, the photos contained within the article are also fabricated, staged by Mr. Moncrief in an attempt to add an atmosphere of “sinister mystery” to his article."
Written by Gertrude Zelle, 2005.
The sinister lies crop up over and over again and Neurocam debunks them each time. But naturally, none of us believe a word of it. Which do you prefer? Neurocam the innocent organisation working towards something you don't understand, but thanks for you help. Or Neurocam, the dark organisation working towards something that appears to be very bad, and you are the pawn?
For some reason, I'd rather be the pawn.
Labels: gertrude zelle, marc moncrief, media, neurocam
