Neurocam and the sinister lies you are not to believe
Everyone knows about The Age article right? Yeah everyone knows about that. Thats what attracted people to Neurocam back in Phase 1. But looking around, there are a few interesting things to be found.
"The newspaper article written by Mr. Marc Moncrief is a potentially slanderous fiction, complied by him from half-truths, materials of questionable veracity and blatant lies. Despite his claims to the contrary, the photos contained within the article are also fabricated, staged by Mr. Moncrief in an attempt to add an atmosphere of “sinister mystery” to his article."
Written by Gertrude Zelle, 2005.
The sinister lies crop up over and over again and Neurocam debunks them each time. But naturally, none of us believe a word of it. Which do you prefer? Neurocam the innocent organisation working towards something you don't understand, but thanks for you help. Or Neurocam, the dark organisation working towards something that appears to be very bad, and you are the pawn?
For some reason, I'd rather be the pawn.
"The newspaper article written by Mr. Marc Moncrief is a potentially slanderous fiction, complied by him from half-truths, materials of questionable veracity and blatant lies. Despite his claims to the contrary, the photos contained within the article are also fabricated, staged by Mr. Moncrief in an attempt to add an atmosphere of “sinister mystery” to his article."
Written by Gertrude Zelle, 2005.
The sinister lies crop up over and over again and Neurocam debunks them each time. But naturally, none of us believe a word of it. Which do you prefer? Neurocam the innocent organisation working towards something you don't understand, but thanks for you help. Or Neurocam, the dark organisation working towards something that appears to be very bad, and you are the pawn?
For some reason, I'd rather be the pawn.
Labels: gertrude zelle, marc moncrief, media, neurocam
The Regional Directors are our liaisons to Neurocam; they take the assignment reports and work with operatives in case any questions or clarification is necessary.
http://tremonti.blogspot.com/2006/06/re-application-status.html
>> Jason Tremonti
jason.tremonti@gmail.com
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:13 PM
Thanks man.
Posted by
Clay |
5:52 PM
I've sent off an e-mail but haven't got a reply yet. I hope they get back to me soon.
Posted by
Clay |
6:10 PM
I have been in NCI for going 18 months now.... wow. Time flies. anyway, welcome to the P2 fold! Let's hope you RD gets in contact soon and we'll start reading about your assignments!
- Elhorranna
Posted by
Elhorranna |
7:09 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Posted by
Hamish |
7:47 PM
I knew your blog would end up being pawn orientanted.
...No?
Well I don't get paid to be funny.
Posted by
Hamish |
7:50 PM
Welcome to the club.
Ya, every operative gets the perception assessment. It's their way of finding out where to put you in the organization
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:03 AM
Welcome aboard clay :)
Regarding your question, it took about two days for me to recieve a confirmation of my application. It took another five days until I recieved my perception assessment. Neurocam operates on a strange schedule, be patient, they'll reply soon.
Posted by
Saeid |
2:09 AM
They're just being slow on me then.
Posted by
Clay |
12:14 PM
Post a Comment